You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'science fiction' tag.
Next month I’ll be at Eastercon, Heathrow. While there I’ll enjoy catching up with old friends, having a gander at the books and generally noodling around. I’m also scheduled to be on two panels: one on the new Dr Who – is it all it’s cracked up to be, etc, and one on dealing with rejection as a writer!
TTFN.
I’m delighted to be able to say that Deciduous Trees has been accepted for publication in the BSFA’s 50th anniversary collection to be published next year.
Last night I finished the short story I’ve been working on for the BSFA’s forthcoming 50th anniversary collection, now titled Deciduous Trees.
I knew that if I did it right it’d make my wife cry when she read it. I gave her the story when she went to bed last night, along with a tissue. “Oh. Is it sad?” she said. “Sort of.”
I gave her half an hour then went up to see how she’d found it; one tissue wasn’t enough and I had to fetch a bog roll. RESULT!
She says it’s by far the best thing I’ve ever written, and used words such as “poetry” and “overwhelming”. This is partly because it’s very a personal story which I’ve put a lot of emotion into – y’know, like a proper writer – but whatever anyone else things of it, that she likes it is good enough for me…
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I went to the British Fantasycon in Nottingham a couple of weeks ago. While there I went to a few panels on publishing and so on, and heard pretty much the same doom and gloom I hear at every such panel: people aren’t buying books, the authors don’t make any money, the publishers don’t make any money, there are too many books and not enough good ones and everything in the industry is pretty much shit. Is there any good news related to publishing and being published, for Christ’s sake?
Well, Sunshine was visually quite spectacular, but for me the story tended to lurch from one quite unbelievable scenario to another. And as for the visual references to 2001: A Space Odyssey and Alien, it seems Tarantino only watched these two films before/while writing the script. There’s even a scene with the crew sitting round chomping a meal while chatting, straight out of Alien. The imagery is really that similar. Maybe this was intentional.
The film, as Ian pointed out to me as we left the cinema, is also highly reminiscent of a certain episode of Thunderbirds. Would I recommend it? I’m not sure. To me it came across as if Tarantino wanted to make an SF thriller that showed SF people how it really should be done, but failing to appreciate the clichés he was using, or the credibility required.
Other problems included corny orchestrated strings at key “emotional” moments, such as when someone dies; the fact that the first ship sent out was called Icarus 1 (uh, you wouldn’t call it “1″ unless you thought you were going to need a “2″ now, would you?), the snow-encrusted Sydney Opera House just to illustrate that it really is that cold on Earth (which also reminded me of the Statue of Liberty scene at the end of Planet of the Apes) and, for me, Big Noises: although atmospheric, there is NO NOISE IN SPACE! And in particular, while it’s feasible for spacecraft to make noises, I don’t believe sunlight makes a noise. (If I’m showing my ignorance of physics here, please feel free to let me know…)
I think I’d give the film three stars out of five. Wear your sunglasses and some sun screen and you should be OK.
Well, Easter’s been and gone, and along with it, Eastercon. This was the first Easter in 10 years I was at home.
The Eastercon in Chester would’ve been my tenth, the anniversary of my first, held at the Adelphi in Liverpool in 1997, but this time I just couldn’t summon up the enthusiasm, I’m afraid. It’s a shame, as it would’ve been a bit of a landmark one for me, but I’m feeling somewhat disenchanted with the whole SF thing at the moment and just didn’t want to go and sit around and queue for breakfast and all that stuff. I was looking at forthcoming cons the other day, too, and none of the UK ones really appeal. Perhaps this is as much to do with other factors as my relationship with SF, but I don’t know.
We’re dutifully sitting down in front of Dr Who on a Saturday evening again, but me and the missus have been very disappointed in the first two episodes of series 3. OK, so episode 1 had to introduce a new character in the form of Martha, which it did with aplomb, but was otherwise fairly empty. Episode 2 was a load of nothing, frankly. Sorry, guys, but while he kids are entertained, you need to offer more than that. (And, to be honest, David Tennant’s Doctor just doesn’t cut the mustard for me.) Primeval was much, much better.
